It's a pretty simple equation when you think about it logically.
If you're a political leader, or a media pundit, or - thanks to the Internet - anyone with a computer and an opinion, and you make "casual, massively hyperbolic use of highly incendiary language" (
Noam Scheiber) to "utter indefensible nonsense" that - if it were true - "a radicalized citizenry would be an appropriate response" (
Conor Friedersdorf) you can prompt nut jobs on the fringes of society to act in a violent manner. Like
Timothy McVeigh. Like
Scott Roeder. Like
Jared Lee Loughner.
Perhaps more dangerously, this frivolous use of language can also inure a citizenry to real threats to our basic rights. After all, if everyone continues to run around crying "wolf" in the form of "treason and socialism and death panels" (oh my!) - eventually, nobody will really believe it if those or other dangers actually come to pass.
Words matter. Words have power. The Internet, and the media soapbox amplify that power almost beyond measure. Misuse of words is abuse of power.
To quote Spiderman's Uncle Ben, "with great power comes great responsibility." How many more senseless acts of violence will our society have to endure before we take that very true statement seriously?